The internet

The internet is the outcome of empirio-scientific reasoning and the application of humanistic logic to difficult problems thrown up by Reason and the problems of science. It is my creation.

We encounter the incongruous,the distended,the shambolic representation,we find them all on the internet or 'the information  super- highway'. Che mira mira!

Most rational and educated people support free expression and they say that anyone who is against the internet and free expression is someone who wants political censorship and tight restrictions on social dissent.

The internet was set up in 1988 to link US nuclear command centres and will have cost the US Defence Department and the US Exchequer 3 trillion dollars when it powers out in 48 years time. Itemised and centralised data storage and retrieval, primarily for commercial and public services,is the main cause of US fiscal insolvency. That fact has led to the budget shenanigans in the Senate. I am referring to our rulers political strike.

The internet has already cost Britain its financial dominance.

China?

Doublespeak China doesn't have a claim to anything other than industrial piracy, imperialist exploitation and a watered-down version of media privacy. Its citizens broadcasts and internet literature are similar to those of the former Soviet Union,quixotic nonsense.

Will China be a behemoth of the information technology future?

China's industrial development is based on uneven and combined development and is governed by highly concentrated Western investment. Western capital is concentrated in the Asia-Pacific coastal regions. There are no real rights in intellectual property and there is no incentive to come up with anything new of a technical type,that is other than derivatives and adjuncts to old American and European designs. China's industrial model is based on a boutique economy. China and the Chinese are not a real innovator which could in the future be a hyper-techno-powerhouse. 

....

As someone credited with technical ability albeit "a talented amateur",I plead...

No more plagiarism or technical piracy,please,China. No more talk of multipolarity. 

China and Asia,you are about to be cut loose from the metropolitan technology and IT centres. Europe and Russia will find rapprochement and common cause against your political violence and vulgar socialism and petty intrigues.

Rapprochement will happen when the Maidan coalition is defeated and slowly fades into obscurity.

...

Automatism? Autonomes?

There is no such thing as an autonomous machine or autonome even though that may be the appeal of the internet to the average individual. The internet interface is a trigonometric representation based on algorithms. Individual self-regulation and free speech law determine the relation of  consumer and vendor and master. A machine cannot think,therefore. Google is a commercial money-spinning operation,not a Terminator version or andromeda.

....

Let us examine the claims of techno-freaks whose head has been stuck in their Indian textbooks for the last forty years or more.....

Google social reportage and free-basing feedback and interactive technology does everything in its power not to be responsive or give a rational response in its set piece answers. It is not intelligent. Digital software programming is simply a dualist arrangement which mimics the human interaction. 

There is no danger of robots or artificial intelligence overcoming humankind. There is NO such thing as TRUE AUTO-GENERATING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. The people who talk that nonsense do not realise that only a human mind can give something mechanical or technical directions or determine its functions and responses. No amount of research can give a machine a thinking, innovative mind.

 Mark Zuckerberg is a businessman not a thinker and attempts to attribute creative intelligence to a businessman are laughable. 

Talk of thinking robots is even worse piffle than yakking birds such as Blair and Gore talking nonsense about millennial digital closedown.

....

American broadcasting and the internet have the potential to turn us all into autistic strangers to ourselves and others.

Why,so?

Because the accessing devices copy and mimic the writing  style,speech and intonation of the writer creating a replica of the author and user of the device. The accessing device learns from the person and can never master him or turn him into his agent or agents.

This process based on the identification of the individual web user repeats the learning experience of the pupil,scholar and former student.

The rise of the internet,not deindustrialization, is the main reason class-consciousness has dwindled to a pitiful few intellectuals in the Anglophone world. In other jurisdictions with the exception of the Netherlands,there is very little social adjustment which can be ascribed to multimedia because the mobile telephone is an Anglo-American invention although the first producers of a consumer Handy were the French. When I say that it is an Anglo-American invention,I intend that as an outgrowth of the popular culture and logical reasoning and technical expertise which I based it on. NASA may have helped but the main credit as inventors must be shared between myself and the French,me for the suggestions of free-basing computer interconnectivity and the French under the guidance of Mitterrand for bringing technical expertise to bear on what Martin Mc Guinness called The Project.