The courts are not best suited for a contest between a litigant claiming malice or negligence and a doctor since on many occasions, reference must be given to trial and error procedures which may or may not work and those are viewed as professional matters involving all forms of uncertainties and loose leads.
However, because of the presence of an aggressive, sectarian,politicised police force and women governed solely by their tides or issues linked to the female menopause or post-menopausal confusion and arrant ill-temperedness,many lawyers have let loose a string of accusations and suits from their offices against clear and definite errors of judgement.
In the North of Ireland,the key appointments of hospital psychiatrists is at the disposal of the Secretary of State and the Head of the N.I.O. Secretariat, Jonathan Powell a position held during the NHS-PSNI-MI 5 Terror by Jonathan Cain.
When you go to law against aan Indian ju-ju merchant or Establishment shrink or overpaid doctor for violent misconduct,for poisoning or for casual libel or for serial defamation by a coven of MI 5 witches and other prostitutes and for abuse of power and against the police for acting ultra vires,you must be prepared for a helter skelter of abuse, physical and verbal.
By who?
Cult members such as psychiatrists and their able helpers, members of the Orange Order,the sporting set and Freemasons in the police.
You will receive precious little assistance from anyone in the trade unions and political occupations. These days because you cannot expect tangible support from even trades unions,you can not avoid arbitrary injustice. The causes are the collapse of social democracy and the legacy of Blair's elective dictatorship. (Blair's tenure in office marked Britain's swansong as a modern power able to field an inventory of proper laws, armies, military tactics,men or materials).
Going to law for justice,then?
One word of warning. As my solicitor perceived on 17 September 1999,you must be prepared to go THE WHOLE WAY. After the resolution of civil matters, you should be prepared to give evidence before a criminal court.
Why?
In prevalent conditions,to have all the THUGS connected to the RUC/PSNI/NHS and British Army and SAS locked up in prison.
Courts and prisons exist to DETER CRIMINALS such as Cody,Davidson, Manley, Rogers,Mc Cartney,Mc Grath,Mc Curry, Flanagan,Anderson, Maguire,O Neill and Sharkey,not to reform anyone but to prevent those types of people causing death and injury.
...
27.8.2022
Lengthy court proceedings?
When you are on the cusp of success against the circus of fools known as doctors and police,you will meet your solicitor in a church where,try as he might,he cannot conceal a look of glee at a successful outcome which he has received advance notice of from a sympathetic court clerk or upright judge. That high-up or low-down informant may be of a different philosophical leaning to yourself,your solicitor and your barrister. He is invariably a man who sees it as a fundamental rule to uphold the rights of the individual and concerned citizen against oppression, violence and threats of indefinite imprisonment.
After this pre-emptive judgement,your main opponent will most certainly appear with a crestfallen appearance. His or her 'cover' has been blown and he has had to sell his house and property which he acquired through dishonesty and insider trading to meet his legal costs. That individual is the main orchestrator of the street terror which threatens to immolate you. He is the kingpin who dispatches spies to report back on your every remark to the police and judicial authorities. He is a heart a naif who fails to realise that,once set in motion,the wheels of justice cannot be turned back.
Whatever a solicitor might say in advance of judgement,he has a good knowledge of the likely outcome. A solicitor though guided by the system of justice-that system is governed by the rules of legal practice-is a creature of instinct who tackles even the wildest beast.
In choosing his clientele,he has a nose for a good reputation and a first class knowledge of even the sternest,most uncompromising litigant's strong points and foibles. A good solicitor is well used to dealing with petty bickering and adversarial flights of fancy, particularly those of a litigant despairing of a successful outcome.
....
14.3.2023
Suing psychiatrists
When you take a doctor or Crown witness-I am thinking of Eaman or Niall Corrigan- to law for libel the main culprit will have stayed in the background. He is a clergyman, businessman or advocate of 'free' living with no real insights nor personal experience nor knowledge of any subject other than religion or moneymaking or criminology. That person acts alone without a proper sense of Reason. He sees not- he has not read the Book of Hebrews or the Book of Revelations -the inexorable advance of his ruination in the person of a well-chosen lawyer,a responsible advocate and in the entreaties of a learned,mature and experienced judge the fatal embrace of his immortal destiny. That binding decision seals his fate. It is manifested in a legal action against his profiteering, illegal activities, priestly games and delusionary foibles. Law casts aside his net of intrigue. His degrace was always a foregone conclusion, be he prince or pauper. In the legal finale when he is compelled to give evidence,he falters. Then,his pride and arrogance are revealed. Under pressure to account rationally for serious crimes and arrant mischief on his part,his memory fails him. Eventually either mind or body collapse under the weight of legal contradictions or his inner demons because he always held unreal perspectives with no basis in fact.
That clergyman,social worker or lay advocate had entirely unrealistic expectations of himself and others. His god was money and his aim was fallible, 'death or glory'. The problem he saw in his legal opponent and the fatal embrace of judgement are,in actuality,his own well-known problem,a personal perspective or an idealistic mindset and idiosyncratic, out-of-date political views.
....
In pendium
While your solicitor has eyes firmly fixed on his quarry,his reports may be either sketchy or in outline. He may merely elucidate the gist of his court pleadings,legal heads of claim or rehash well-known principles of civil and procedural justice and the odd revealing insight which reveals the true professional cunning,the burning loathing of a particular category or class of person and a bright desire to see justice done whatever might be the cost to him or his client, however long may be the day.
When victory is in sight and he has smelt the blood of a mortally wounded opponent after a lengthy struggle,he will not be able to conceal his pleasure and contempt for the defendant and will ridicule those wayfaring "worthies" who thought they could hoodwink a judge or distract a lawyer using pleasant remarks. They do so with the aim of allowing a lawbreaker to escape, allowing him the fleeting pleasure of his "trivial pursuits".Very few lawyers fall for pub-talk or the small talk of these "rambling boys of pleasure".
....
10.7.2023
Denouement before the courts
Seeing the course through to its bitter end as we are all inclined to do- Ol' Lady Law is a Slow Learner and a Harsh Mistress-requires that," When going to Law,we do not change horses in mid-stream, particularly when we have acquired through circumstance or political engagement many Fair Weather Friends and a coterie of female admirers anxious to dig deep into our pockets without ever having exerted themselves on our behalf or engaged openly at the court level as witnesses or been involved in any trade or profession apart from pettyfogging and parlour games".
The latter's idea of armed and mortal combat is hatpins at dawn,a game of consanguineous marbles or rhetorical skittles, idle street-jiving and dating invitations. The male thug and shit stirrer,those such as Ronnie Drew and folksters might sing about "a digging match and a fight" and Leninists and socialist agitators and wreckers carp on about "political exposures"," investigative journalism" and "police exposures" but the courts adjudicate on legal matters not corner-boys with concealed knives.
As a proper melody has it,the alternative to law is war and thuggery. Ditto,those random acts of violence which are idolised by insurgents and their fellow travellers. Behind the law stands force,armed force and a gun which "banishes fear with the speed of a flame".
In drunken reminiscing,rebels are recreating Luke Kelly's death from inhaling his own vomit. Our Northerners belated response to ballad groups and rebel songsters is, "Accidents will happen even to heroes such as he" (Pete St. John, Smith of Bristol).
....
Going to law? The ecstasy of gold? Fear of punishment? Hope of reward?
My part in going to law against Sinn Fein gangsters and the British Army (and related organisations who they feed of) is to have my good name given back to me and the fruits of my endeavours to be in my account in the bank not that of Gerry Adams or Gerry Kelly or Martin Mc Guinness or Ruairi and Lochlann Quinn or Eugene Mc Cartan or Gerry Mc Corry....
....
15.8.2024
If you go to law against a doctor or other medical practitioner,do not allow yourself to be drawn into a legal battle against your solicitor,too. That is known as double jeopardy because you will be hit with all sorts of legal arguments and quixotic arrangements.
The legal process can be long drawn-out and complex. Contradiction lies at the heart of adversarial law. Be patient and the legal process will eventually yield results if you have chosen a careful and fastidious lawyer with an eye for detail.
Bon chance!
I sign myself,
" A litigant"
